关于案件管辖Jurisdiction over cases
1.【排他性管辖协议的推定】涉外合同或者其他财产权益纠纷的当事人签订的管辖协议明确约定由一国法院管辖，但未约定该管辖协议为非排他性管辖协议的，应推定该管辖协议为排他性管辖协议。
[Presumption of An Exclusive Jurisdiction Agreement] Where a jurisdiction agreement entered into by and between the litigants to a foreign-related contract or a dispute over other property rights and interests explicitly stipulates that the court of one country shall exercise jurisdiction but does not stipulate that the jurisdiction agreement is a non- exclusive jurisdiction agreement, the jurisdiction agreement shall be presumed to be an exclusive jurisdiction agreement.
2.【非对称管辖协议的效力认定】涉外合同或者其他财产权益纠纷的当事人签订的管辖协议明确约定一方当事人可以从一个以上国家的法院中选择某国法院提起诉讼，而另一方当事人仅能向一个特定国家的法院提起诉讼，当事人以显失公平为由主张该管辖协议无效的，人民法院不予支持；但管辖协议涉及消费者、劳动者权益或者违反民事诉讼法专属管辖规定的除外。[Determination of Validity of Asymmetric Jurisdiction Agreement] Where a jurisdiction agreement entered into by and between the litigants to a foreign-related contract or a dispute over other property rights and interests explicitly stipulates that one party may select a court of a country from courts of more than one countries to initiate a lawsuit, and the other party may initiate a lawsuit in the court of only one particular country only, if the party claims that the jurisdiction agreement is invalid on the ground of obvious unfairness, the people's court shall not uphold such claim, except that the jurisdiction agreement involves the rights and interests of consumers or laborers or violates the exclusive jurisdiction provisions of the Civil Procedure Law.
3.【跨境消费者网购合同管辖协议的效力】网络电商平台使用格式条款与消费者订立跨境网购合同，未采取合理方式提示消费者注意合同中包含的管辖条款，消费者根据民法典第四百九十六条的规定主张该管辖条款不成为合同内容的，人民法院应予支持。
网络电商平台虽已尽到合理提示消费者注意的义务，但该管辖条款约定在消费者住所地国以外的国家法院诉讼，不合理加重消费者寻求救济的成本，消费者根据民法典第四百九十七条的规定主张该管辖条款无效的，人民法院应予支持。
[Validity of Jurisdiction Agreement on Cross-border Consumer Online Shopping Contracts] Where an e-commerce platform enters into a cross-border online shopping contract with a consumer with standard clauses but fails to prompt the consumer to pay attention to the jurisdiction clause contained in the contract in a reasonable manner, and the consumer claims that such jurisdiction clause shall not form part of the contract in accordance with Article 496 of the Civil Code, the people's court shall uphold the claim.
Where the e-commerce platform has performed the obligation of reasonably prompting the consumer to pay attention, but the jurisdiction clause stipulates that such lawsuit shall be filed in a court in a country other than the country where the consumer is domiciled, which will increase the consumer's costs of seeking remedies unreasonably, if the consumer claims that the jurisdiction clause is invalid according to Article 497 of the Civil Code, the people's court shall uphold the claim.
在线下载列表
资源售价：1 点
下载地址1
